Re: [Engine-devel] Bridgeless Networks api design

From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Michael Pasternak" <mpastern(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 10:39:48 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Bridgeless Networks api design On 03/18/2012 10:43 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote: > On 03/18/2012 10:21 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: >> On 03/18/2012 09:33 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote: >>> the question is Management/Migration/Storage/Display can be >>> non-bridged?, if so, >>> <bridged>true|false</bridged> makes sense. >> >> bridge is an implementation detail at host level, hence the >> discussion is about abstracting it from users. >> a VM network doesn't have to have bridge at host level, for >> networks using VMFex or SR-IOV > > <network> > <designation>Management|Migration|Storage|Display|VM</designation> > </network> > > what do you say about having it as another /designation/ type? > it==VM? the above looks ok to me. (I really hope for a better element name than designation though)

_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel