From: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:41:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
On 01/29/2013 04:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:44:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
>>
>> On 01/21/2013 09:45 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>> On 01/21/2013 10:28 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "Michael Pasternak" <mpastern(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>,
>>>>> engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 8:27:36 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Michael Pasternak" <mpastern(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> To: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:24:58 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/17/2013 01:04 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
>>>>>>> Once 3.2.0 is released I think we should move to
>>>>>>> 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the master branch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>> I agree, and this is not the only place where should start
>>>>> marking
>>>>
>>>> and cluster compatibility version..
>>>
>>> all above is true, but Juan meant preparing MVN infra for the
>>> next
>>> development iteration, while you're talking about engine
>>> internals,
>>> maybe we should file BZs on that (as next version tasks) or
>>> should
>>> we
>>> define new process of preparing for the next version that will
>>> include both?
>>
>> As I don't see hard opposition to this change I will merge it
>> tomorrow.
>> Please raise your hand iif you think it shouldn't be merged.
>>
>>
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11143
>
> For the poms, why didn't you use a variable that is inherited? But
> Java is not my domain.
Maven doesn't support use of variables in any of the coordinates of
the
artifacts or of their parents. If you use variables, specially if you
use them in the "version" of the parent project and the variable is
inherited from the parent project, there is no way to determine which
version of the parent project should be used.
That's correct, but you can set the version numbers of the ovirt artifacts to
${parent.version}. But let's do it in a next patch, we already spent enough time on
this :) Merge!
>
> Tarball should be ovirt-engine-3.3.0_master.tar.gz
> RPM release should be ovirt-engine-3.3.0-0.0.master
>
> This will enable us to release milestones, such as beta1, beta2,
> rc1, rc2 and finally release without suffix.
>
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat
S.L.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel