Hi,
yeah I think it should be like that.
> * Should it pass the same checks than a Bug-Url?
> Most probably yes
> Right now that is:
> - Public
> - Target release
> - Product
> * Should it change the bug statuses too?
> Most probably no
> * Should it update the external trackers of the bug?
> Most probably yes
--
Martin Sivák
msivak(a)redhat.com
Red Hat Czech
RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ
----- Original Message -----
> On 08/27, Martin Sivak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to ask if it might be possible for the gerrit hook to stop
>> giving -1 to patches that do not have bug-url, but have related-to.
>>
>> The reason for this is that I have a rather large patchset that is adding a
>> new feature. No single patch by itself fixes the referenced bug and there
>> are also patches that are not related to the feature itself, but were
>> backported because they did some refactoring that was needed for the code
>> to apply and/or work properly.
>
> I have a couple question, which of these should happen for the
> Related-To bugs?
>
> * Should it pass the same checks than a Bug-Url?
> Most probably yes
> Right now that is:
> - Public
> - Target release
> - Product
> * Should it change the bug statuses too?
> Most probably no
> * Should it update the external trackers of the bug?
> Most probably yes
>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Sivák
>> msivak(a)redhat.com
>> Red Hat Czech
>> RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> --
> David Caro
>
> Red Hat S.L.
> Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>
> Tel.: +420 532 294 605
> Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
> Web:
www.redhat.com
> RHT Global #: 82-62605
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel