I would be happy if we can lose vds_dynamic all together, and just keep
vds_static and vds_statistics. Our performance will be happy too ;-)
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Eli Mesika <emesika(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 4:00:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "Liran Zelkha" <liran.zelkha(a)gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:12:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Liran Zelkha" <liran.zelkha(a)gmail.com>
> > > To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:04:29 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> > >
> > > Why not move it to vds_static?
> >
> > +1 on Liran's comment.
+1 as well , vds_static is the place for that
> > I would prefer not to add more complexity to the vds tables family.
> > Such complexity may effect performs of queries/views.
> > If you wish, you can create a view on top of vds_static named
vds_on_boot
> > for
> > querying of vds on boot info.
> >
> > Yair
>
> That means moving almost all of vds_dynamic into vds_static except of
memory,
> pending resources and status (maybe more but not much);
> and there will not be any db separation between user input and on_boot
data.
Why we should have such separation ?
>
> Thanks,
> Gilad.
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi list,
> > > >
> > > > I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables:
> > > > - vds_dynamic
> > > > - vds_on_boot
> > > > We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once
the
> > > > host is booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it.
> > > > In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on
> > > > migrate
> > > > all non-dynamic host data (cpu, os, etc.).
> > > >
> > > > thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Gilad.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Engine-devel mailing list
> > > > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> > > >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Engine-devel mailing list
> > > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> > >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel