Does anyone have any other input or objections about anything *other than*
which repos we're using?
Best wishes,
Greg
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14 February 2017 at 09:53, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Martin Perina
<mperina(a)redhat.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> why is this package not contained also in ovirt-master-snapshot
>> >>>> repository [6]? Most of developers are using
ovirt-master-snapshot,
>> because
>> >>>> this is the official repository for oVirt depelopers as
mentioned
>> in [7] and
>> >>>> [8]. AFAIK there was not yet any official announcement that
every
>> developer
>> >>>> should switch from ovirt-master-snapshot to ovirt-tested-master
...
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I think we should make it official then for master, we've hit
too
>> many
>> >>> issues in the past weeks due to this repository, that I don't
want
>> to see
>> >>> new projects added to it.
>> >
>> >
>> > You've run into issues, because
>> >
>> > migration to the "new" system is not well prepared. I'm still
a bit
>> angry
>> > that you have forced me to migrate all ovirt-engine-extensions*
>> projects
>> > into standard CI (which took me more than 2 days) by breaking existing
>> build
>> > jobs which worked fine until recent changes. And I had to do fast that
>> > otherwise I won't be able to provide new build for upstream 4.1.0
>> async and
>> > 4.1.1 builds ...
>>
>> I think there is some miss-communication here. The old '-snapshot'
>> repo is causing issues because of the way it is built. We want people
>> to move away from it. However, we did not intend to force anyone to
>> move. It is still there, and the nightly jobs still update it with all
>> the packages that have been in it so far.
>>
>>
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt_master_publish-rpms_nightly/
>>
>> I really don't see how any of the recent changes forced you to change
>> your project's own jobs, but it is a good thing if you did.
>>
>
> Well, build jobs just started to fail and I discussed with either you or
> Gil and you just told me that why it's failing and the only solution is to
> move std CI.
> But let's leave this behind us,
>
> ovirt-engine-extensions* move to std-CI and build jobs are working now
> correctly ...
>
>
>> > So I don't have an issue to move from ovirt-master-snapshot repos to
>> > ovirt-tested-master repos, but please do that properly:
>> >
>> > 1. Announce on mailing lists that every developer should switch at
>> least a
>> > week before the change
>>
>> We were planning, since all repos currently exist side-by-side we saw
>> no rush to do that.
>>
>> > 2. Update all developer related documentation about this change
>>
>> Well, I'm not sure where such things are documented currently, but
>> that is a reasonable request.
>>
>> > 2. Maintain both repos for a week and only after that turn off
>> > ovirt-master-snapshots repos
>>
>> We did not turn it off yet. It is still there. The only thing that
>> happened is that the new JS projects, that were never in that repo to
>> begin with, chose to forgo publishing to it.
>>
>
> Sure, that's why I asked to put this ovirt-js-dependencies package into
> ovirt-master-snapshot repo, which all developers are using ...
>
>
>
>>
>> > Exported artifacts is not enough, please provide
>> ovirt-release-tested-master
>> > RPM which will include all necessary repositories same way as we
>> currenlty
>> > have in ovirt-release-master
>>
>> There is some subtle distinction here that needs to be well understood.
>> Some repos are build to emulate an oVirt release, and all or most of
>> the packages are collected in them. The 'tested' repo is an example of
>> such a repo. For such repos it makes sense to create a
>> '*-release-*.rpm'.
>>
>
> So ovirt-release-master RPM will add repositories with needed packages
> to develop engine/VDSM. For engine development it means you have following
> packages:
>
> ovirt-master-snapshot:
> otopi
> ovirt-host-deploy
> ovirt-setup-lib
> ovirt-vmconsole
>
> ovirt-master-snapshot-static
> ovirt-engine-wildfly
> ovirt-engine-wildfly-overlay
>
> ovirt-master-patternfly1-noarch-epel
> patternfly1
>
> There are other packages, but those are needed only when developing
> relevant parts of engine (for example "unboundid-ldapsdk" needed for
> ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap).
>
> So in my opinion if you want to switch to ovirt-latest-tested repo, we
> need to have available also those dependencies, that's why I think it's
> required to have ovirt-release-latest-tested RPM which will install all
> repos to develop and even install/run master oVirt from RPM.
>
>
Make sense to me. Current effort anyway it to reach a point where nothing
need to be changes, just the content of ovirt-master-snapshot will be
genertared from latest-tested instead of from jenkins master nightly
publisher job.
>
>> The 'exported-artifacts' repos are meant to allow "upstream"
or
>> "build-dependency" projects to have their own release stream that is
>> independent of oVirt's release stream. For such repos it makes little
>> sense to keep a '*-release-*.rpm'.
>>
>> All projects that have a 'build-articats job now have an
>> 'exported-artifacts' repo and their packages are submitted to OST so
>> eventually also end up in the 'tested' repo. It is left to the
>> consuming projects to pick which repo to use depending on how tightly
>> are they coupled with consumed packages.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Barak Korren
>> bkorren(a)redhat.com
>> RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team
>>
https://ifireball.wordpress.com/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Greg Sheremeta, MBA
Red Hat, Inc.
Sr. Software Engineer
gshereme(a)redhat.com