1:35 p.m.
On 11/11/2013 08:48 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shubhendu Tripathi" <shtripat(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:07:44 AM
>
> On 11/06/2013 07:40 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Alexander Wels" <awels(a)redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 8:28:13 AM
>>>
>>> Looking at the code, if you start the error message with a $ it will not
>>> do
>>> the . to _ replacement. Not sure if your error message will now simply
>>> start
>>> with a $, but it is worth a try I guess.
>> AFAIK: the '$' prefix is for variable-value message.
>> e.g. if you have a message "cannot run VM ${vm-name}" and another one
>> "$vm-name vm1",
>> then their combination would eventually yield "cannot run VM vm1".
>> Also, I think that messages that begin with "$" cannot be displayed
when
>> they
>> are on their own.
>> i.e. if you will get message "$vm-name vm1" 'alone', nothing
will
>> eventually be displayed.
>> but, as I mentioned, if you will get message "$vm-name vm1" along with
>> message "cannot run
>> VM ${vm-name}", eventually "cannot run VM vm1" will be displayed.
>>
>> I think that the replacement of "." to "_" should be done
only if the
>> message
>> represents a *key* in the relevant resource (VdsmErrors in this case).
>> but if the message is not a key, and would be displayed as-is, on "."
to
>> "_" replacement
>> should take place.
>> adding Derez for his thoughts (I think that he changed something around it
>> a while ago).
> There is an upstream patch according to Einav's suggestion above.
> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21083/
Many thanks, Shubhendu.
@Derez - any chance that you can take a look (as you probably understand best
this particular code/logic)?
Daniel, any comments on the patch ?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21083/
>>> On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 03:37:34 PM Shubhendu Tripathi wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In the case of Gluster, as there are no one to one mappings available
>>>> for all the error messages from Gluster, we set the error in the
>>>> VdcFault object as NULL.
>>>> We also populate the actual error from the Gluster as error message in
>>>> the fault object.
>>>>
>>>> /getReturnValue().getExecuteFailedMessages().add(error);//
>>>> //getReturnValue().getFault().setMessage(error);//
>>>> //getReturnValue().getFault().setError(null);/
>>>>
>>>> Because of above settings and the below code snippet in /Frontend.java/
>>>> class the error message as is gets displayed on the error dialog -
>>>> /
>>>> //public String translateVdcFault(final VdcFault fault) {//
>>>> // return
>>>> getVdsmErrorsTranslator().TranslateErrorTextSingle(fault.getError() ==
>>>> null//
>>>> // ? fault.getMessage() : fault.getError().toString());//
>>>> //}//
>>>> /
>>>> Well and good till now !!
>>>>
>>>> But while translation of the error messages, all the occurrences of
"."
>>>> get replaced with "_".
>>>> This causes an issue for the gluster errors. If the error message sent
>>>> from gluster has "."s (say IP Address of a host or FQDN for a
host),
>>>> that also gets replaced with "_" and the error message does not
look
>>>> correct.
>>>>
>>>> Request your suggestion for handling such a case.
>>>>
>>>> *PS: *One thing I can think of is, introducing a flag called
>>>> /isExternalError/ in /VdcFault/ class to identify if the source of the
>>>> fault is external. From Gluster we would set the flag as /true/, and
>>>> while replacement of "." with "_", if the flag is set
it will not do the
>>>> replacements.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Shubhendu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Engine-devel mailing list
>>> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
>
>