Re: [Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
----- Original Message -----
From: "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizrahi(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:39:49 PM
I do express that empty mount options SHOULD NOT send an empty
string, rather, omit the whole argument.
Yes, this should be handled on the backend side (Yair - please note, maybe it is already
implemented like this - don't know): When getting a null-or-empty "mount
options" value from the client, the backend needs to make sure to *not* set the
relevant parameter in the vdsm verb at all.
So leaving the "mount options" text-box empty in the GUI is legal, only needs to
be handled in a certain way in the backend.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Einav Cohen" <ecohen(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>, "Ayal Baron"
> <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizrahi(a)redhat.com>, "Andrew
Cathrow"
> <acathrow(a)redhat.com>, "Miki Kenneth"
> <mkenneth(a)redhat.com>, "Simon Grinberg"
<sgrinber(a)redhat.com>,
> "Eldan Hildesheim" <ehildesh(a)redhat.com>, "Eldan
> Hildesheim" <info(a)eldanet.com>, "Alexey Chub"
<achub(a)redhat.com>,
> engine-devel(a)ovirt.org, "Haim Ateya"
> <hateya(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:28:31 AM
> Subject: Re: PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:21:42 PM
> >
> > On 05/10/2012 04:16 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
> > > Please review the mock-ups on the feature page:
> > > http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Changes_in_GUI
> > >
> > > Comments are welcome.
> >
> > From talking to Haim I understood that path should include ":"
>
> From talking to Ayal, the path can be similar in its format to a
> path
> provided when creating an NFS storage domain (e.g.
> "server:/dir1/dir2"), *or* to a path provided when creating a Local
> storage domain (e.g. "/tmp/dir3"), meaning, without ":".
> @Ayal - any chance for a clarification here?
>
> > In addition - if we only support V1, why add the combo box?
>
> We are always showing the combo-box, even if we have only one
> option
> in it (so the user will know what is the value that is being sent).
> However, we disable it. I updated the mock-up to clarify this.
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Thanks,
> > > Einav
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel