Re: [Engine-devel] restapi: 'gluster' prefix

>>> why not having type in volume?, >> >> >> >> because the different volumes would be entirely different entities not resembling each other > > > >it's still works for our api, as non relevant properties does not shown in resource representation, > >we using this concept all over the api. > > properties - yes, but I'm afraid the sub-collections might be different and we don't have support for that