On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag% > 3Ablocker%2B%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status% > 3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified > we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers. > > We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag% > 3Ablocker%3F%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status% > 3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified > > 1525907 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> Storage > vdsm General danken(a)redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a > restart in fresh install... > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> urgent urgent > ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12 > > Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we can > postpone to 4.2.1. > I don't think it is for me to review. The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to claim that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for Simone to reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam, that this is a problem of host connectivity to its storage?

Yaniv Bronheim, if we don't need to block on this, please tag VDSM for > release. > >

2017-12-18 8:37 GMT+01:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt;: > > > 2017-12-18 8:29 GMT+01:00 Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt;: > >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag% >>> 3Ablocker%2B%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew >>> %2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified >>> we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers. >>> >>> We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag% >>> 3Ablocker%3F%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew >>> %2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified >>> >>> 1525907 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> Storage >>> vdsm General danken(a)redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a >>> restart in fresh install... >>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> urgent urgent >>> ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12 >>> >>> Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we >>> can postpone to 4.2.1. >>> >> >> I don't think it is for me to review. >> >> The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to >> claim that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for >> Simone to reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam, >> that this is a problem of host connectivity to its storage? >> > > Adam, Nir, Tal, Allon, can you please review? > Any update?