On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 03:16:10PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > Hi all, > We have several scripts spread in the source, typically installed in > /usr/libexec/vdsm. > We had a useless WHITELIST[1], trying to compile these scripts with python3, and > we have similar (but working) whitelist for pyflakes and pep8. > To simplify the various checks, I think we need to to do this: > 1. Keep .py suffix for all python files > 2. Move all scripts to helpers/ ([2] handles storage scripts) > 3. During installation, strip the .py suffix.

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 03:16:10PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > Hi all, > > We have several scripts spread in the source, typically installed in > /usr/libexec/vdsm. > We had a useless WHITELIST[1], trying to compile these scripts with python3, and > we have similar (but working) whitelist for pyflakes and pep8. > > To simplify the various checks, I think we need to to do this: > 1. Keep .py suffix for all python files > 2. Move all scripts to helpers/ ([2] handles storage scripts) > 3. During installation, strip the .py suffix. > > With these changes, we can use the various checking commands on the entire > source tree. > > For example, these commands check the entire tree: > > PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 -m compileall -f -x '(\.tox/|\.git/)' . > pep8 . > pyflakes . > > Thoughts? > > [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/58204 > [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/57363 Sounds good, though I'd love to keep the separation of scripts into their natuaral vertical. Keep storage understand storage, etc. Why are you piling them into one source directory?

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 02:53:41PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 03:16:10PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We have several scripts spread in the source, typically installed in > >> /usr/libexec/vdsm. > >> We had a useless WHITELIST[1], trying to compile these scripts with python3, and > >> we have similar (but working) whitelist for pyflakes and pep8. > >> > >> To simplify the various checks, I think we need to to do this: > >> 1. Keep .py suffix for all python files > >> 2. Move all scripts to helpers/ ([2] handles storage scripts) > >> 3. During installation, strip the .py suffix. > >> > >> With these changes, we can use the various checking commands on the entire > >> source tree. > >> > >> For example, these commands check the entire tree: > >> > >> PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 -m compileall -f -x '(\.tox/|\.git/)' . > >> pep8 . > >> pyflakes . > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/58204 > >> [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/57363 > > > > Sounds good, though I'd love to keep the separation of scripts into > > their natuaral vertical. Keep storage understand storage, etc. Why are > > you piling them into one source directory? > > This is a separate topic. > > The helpers do not belong in the library - we should keep libv/vdsm/xxx > with only the code that is needed for the xxx package. Helpers are external > programs that should have access only to public vdsm apis, so they don't > need to and should not have access to other files inside lib/vdsm/xxx. > > This also make the source easier to understand, the structure is closer to > the final structure after installation. > > So we can have: > > helpers/storage > helpers/virt > ... > > But I don't see any value in this separation, we have only about 10 > helpers. > > Also each directory we add adds overhead of more useless autotools > files to maintain. Look how many makefiles we got rid by moving all the > tests to one directory. Ok, I'm convinced.

_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel