On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Piotr Kliczewski
<piotr.kliczewski(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> One more failure [1]
I posted this:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/73074
Hopefully we can understand this failure better when we reproduce this with the
data that fail the checksum.
Partial success, we have now a failing test:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/7618/console
It fail because we don't have a checksum on storage:
expected='9\x19\x00\x00', actual='\x00\x00\x00\x00'
So now we need to understand why the checksum bytes were not written to storage
in this test, but was in storage the other 999 tests.
Nir
>
> [1]
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/7610/console
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Piotr Kliczewski
> <piotr.kliczewski(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Nir,
>>
>> I saw this issue in [1]:
>>
>> 10:20:12 FAIL: test_send_receive (storage_mailbox_test.TestMailbox)
>> 10:20:12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 10:20:12 Traceback (most recent call last):
>> 10:20:12 File
>>
"/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc25-x86_64/vdsm/tests/storage_mailbox_test.py",
>> line 132, in test_send_receive
>> 10:20:12 self.assertFalse(expired, 'message was not processed on
time')
>> 10:20:12 AssertionError: message was not processed on time
>>
>> it is something known?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> [1]
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc25-x86_64/1541/con...