Re: [Engine-devel] Floating Disk feature description

----- Original Message ----- From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 12:47:35 PM On 02/02/2012 05:13 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote: >>> If they are the same, then please use the term 'image'. >> >> As I said - no technical problem doing that, however in the engine >> we >> use the term "Disk" and the current name of the relevant VMs >> sub-tab >> is "Disks" and the name of the new main tab would be "Disks" (or >> "Virtual Disks"), etc. - so it will be strange to call the feature >> "floating image" when "floating" is going to be column in a GUI >> grid >> titled "Disks". >> I assume that you can also find explanations of why using the term >> "Disk" is confusing and "Image" is better; I am just genuinely not >> sure what is less confusing. > This is inconsistency I agree, but I think that from the User > perspective we should stick with either Disk or Drive. In any OS > of a Server/Desktop the term rather Disk or Drives. I'd go with what the REST API calls them right now, as changing it would be the painful part.