1:42 a.m.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 9:34 AM Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 10:06 PM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:37 AM Anton Marchukov <amarchuk(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Milan.
> >>
> >> We do not necessary need it earlier, but we want to have some date in
> >> mind, so we can plan our CI work accordingly.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts for engine? Should it also target Feb 18?
> >>
> >
> > On Feb 19th we should release oVirt 4.3.1 RC (4.3.1 GA na Feb 26th along
> > with RHV 4.3 beta 2), so I'd say let's branch after the final 4.3.1
build
> > ...
>
> I believe we needn't branch out Vdsm and Engine on the same date, right?
> So we can branch out Vdsm earlier than Engine, around Feb 18-19, is it
> OK?
I think we need to branch VDSM first and right after branching merge tge patch
introducing 4.4 support https://gerrit.ovirt.org/96632
We want vdsm-4.30.z to support engine-4.4. Thus I don't see why we
should wait for anything. https://gerrit.ovirt.org/96632 should be in
yesterday.
> When VDSM with the patch merged will pass OST, we can branch engine and merge
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/96631
> If we will do that in different order, then master OST will be broken
>
> But what I wanted to mention is that we should branch either early enough to be able
to deliver 4.3.1 without any issues or right after 4.3.1 is out to have everything ready
before 4.3.2 work starts.
>
>>
>> >> Anton.
>> >>
>> >> > On 4 Feb 2019, at 15:41, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Anton Marchukov <amarchuk(a)redhat.com> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Since oVirt 4.3.0 released are we ready to branch master into
4.3?
>> >> >
>> >> > Regarding Vdsm, there is still an ongoing storage work for 4.3 and
no
>> >> > really strong pressure for branching out 4.3 I'm aware of. For
that
>> >> > reason, Vdsm developers have agreed that we could create Vdsm
ovirt-4.3
>> >> > branch on February 18 (and no significantly later than that). If
the
>> >> > branch is needed earlier for infra or other reasons, we can make
it.
>> >> > Storage work would have to be backported, but that can be mostly
trivial
>> >> > if an initial master-merge rush is avoided.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Milan
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Anton Marchukov
>> >> Team Lead - Release Management - RHV DevOps - Red Hat
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Perina
> Associate Manager, Software Engineering
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/HVBZ4UAZGGS...