----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske@mittwald.de> To: devel@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:36:39 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization
On 05/11/14 17:07, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
This way, you'd have one "core" module, providing most general functionality/abstractions. Then you'd have more specific modules, plugged into "core" module's API etc. In other words, hierarchy of modules. This is essentially modularization taken to extreme :)
Welcome to dependency hell or circular dependencies etc.
Just because the problem of circular dependencies exists, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to build systems utilizing dependencies. It can be solved/addressed. "Division by zero" is a known problem in integral arithmetic, but it doesn't prevent calculator manufacturers from producing simple calculators, right?
would you like to code your own dependency resolver?
No, I'd like to use what's already available. http://requirejs.org/ http://www.2ality.com/2014/09/es6-modules-final.html
I like modularization, but you can overengineer everything.
I don't consider modular architecture as over-engineering. If we define modules on reasonable level of granularity, the end result might be better than one big monolithic GWT application.
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel