Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske(a)mittwald.de>
To: devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:36:39 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization
On 05/11/14 17:07, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> This way, you'd have one "core" module, providing most general
> functionality/abstractions. Then you'd have more specific modules,
> plugged into "core" module's API etc. In other words, hierarchy of
> modules. This is essentially modularization taken to extreme :)
Welcome to dependency hell or circular dependencies etc.
Just because the problem of circular dependencies exists, doesn't
mean we shouldn't try to build systems utilizing dependencies. It
can be solved/addressed.
"Division by zero" is a known problem in integral arithmetic, but
it doesn't prevent calculator manufacturers from producing simple
calculators, right?
would you like to code your own dependency resolver?
No, I'd like to use what's already available.
http://requirejs.org/
http://www.2ality.com/2014/09/es6-modules-final.html
I like modularization, but you can overengineer everything.
I don't consider modular architecture as over-engineering. If
we define modules on reasonable level of granularity, the end
result might be better than one big monolithic GWT application.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel