On 04/16/2012 04:34 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> The alternative to HTTP Prefer would be creating a new header (as
i am
> not aware of any other /approved/ header that fits the bill). This
> requires writing an RFC and get it approved, which would take much
> longer, and which would likely get the comment of "Why aren't you
> using Prefer".
I'm more worried about "persistent-auth" than 'prefer'. We could
always
contact the draft author (jasnell(a)gmail.com) and ask for his opinion.
I can do this.
Regards,
Geert