On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Gena Makhomed <gmm(a)csdoc.com> wrote:
On 30.07.2015 10:49, Nux! wrote:
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like
> a serious one.
>
Ok, done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
P.S.
As I can see -
bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Product
does not contain qemu-kvm-ev Component at all - looks
like this is yet another bug - in the bugzilla settings.
Adding oVirt devel mailing list.
But I can't find how to report this bugzilla misconfiguration,
so I just report this oVirt bugreport as bugreport for package
qemu-kvm-rhev from Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Product.
I hope this help.
Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2] to see if the bug has been
fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ?
[1]
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/
[2]
http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/
----- Original Message -----
>
On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote:
>>
>> Yes, you can.
>>> In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to
>>> rebuild.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself,
>> because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug,
>> which is already fixed in Debian:
>>
>> If you want to migrate Windows from hardware node
>> to VM using CentOS 7.1 on hardware node and libvirt xml config:
>>
>> <domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='
>>
http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'>
>> .....
>> <qemu:commandline>
>> <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/>
>> <qemu:arg value='file=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/>
>> </qemu:commandline>
>> </domain>
>>
>> Winodws not working correctly in this case, because Windows requires,
>> what oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC must be also placed
>> into oem_id and oem_table_id of RSDT.
>>
>> Debian version of qemu-kvm contains workaround for this windows bug,
>> and using Debian - Windows VM will works fine. But CentOS packages
>> does not contain such workaround, so qemu-kvm-ev now must be patched
>> manually with each new release.
>>
>> Patch already was created by Michael Tokarev in 2014:
>> this is file mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff
>> from
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/qemu-kvm
>>
>> This patch cleanly applies also to qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1
>>
>> See mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff
>> and qemu-kvm.spec.patch in attach for details.
>>
>> After executing rpmbuild -ba qemu-kvm.spec
>> you can place new qemu-kvm binaries into
>> /srv/download/centos/7/privat/x86_64/Packages
>> create local repo and use it for upgrading rpm packages,
>> for example, see privat.repo and privat-createrepo-7-x86_64
>> in attach.
>>
>> ==============================================================
>>
>> Better if this workaround of Windows bug will be included
>> into RHEL/CentOS ovirt repo binaries, and this will allow
>> to anybody easy migrate Windows from hardware nodes
>> to VMs and easy run CentOS/RHEL at hardware nodes.
>>
>>
>> P.S.
>> After patching qemu-kvm - option
>> acpitable works without any bugs:
>>
>> # man qemu-kvm
>>
>> -acpitable [sig=str][...]
>> If a SLIC table is supplied to qemu,
>> then the oem_id from the SLIC table
>> will be copied into the RSDT table
>> (this is a Debian addition).
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>
>> Is it possible to use binary packages build from
>>>>
>>>>
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-...
>>>> with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS
>>>> (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
>>>>
>>>> Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots?
>>>> (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
>>>>
>>>> Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
>>>>
>>>
--
Best regards,
Gena
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt(a)centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com