What if gerrit used the dependency info and would not -1 patches
that are dependency of a patch with a bug url?
That is not a bad idea, but there is one use case you do not consider.. it would mean that
feature cannot be merged before it is completed.
I like my patches to be merged as soon as possible. Of course if the patches leave the
tree in working state.
The patchset that started this thread already depends on about 15 patches that were merged
to master two moths ago.
--
Martin Sivák
msivak(a)redhat.com
Red Hat Czech
RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin Sivak" <msivak(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>, devel(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:22:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
> >
> > > Why can't you put bug url on all of these patches?
> >
> > Because Bug-Url does
> >
> > > > About this, the patches that have the Related-To should be taken into
> > > > account when changing the bug to MODIFIED?
> > >
> > > NO!
> >
> > this.
>
> But it does this only when merged - you just have to state clearly that
> a series of patches must be merged together. If the maintainer ignores
> your note, it not your problem ;-)
>
What if gerrit used the dependency info and would not -1 patches
that are dependency of a patch with a bug url?
>
> Nir
>