Dave,
If I'm not mistaking, there is a big difference between separated queries to the
attestation server and aggregated one?
Is it true?
Thanks,
Ofri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Ofri Masad" <omasad(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Oved Ourfalli" <ovedo(a)redhat.com>, "Wei D Chen"
<wei.d.chen(a)intel.com>, engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 10:20:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Design wiki page for trusted compute pools integration with
oVirt has been updated
On 04/21/2013 10:13 AM, Ofri Masad wrote:
> Hi,
> One more thing we need to think about for the second approach - aggregated
> query. On engine start we need to determine the trust state of all the
> hosts. sending a separate query for each host will overload the
> attestation host and the network. an initial aggregated query needs to be
> send when the engine starts.
> Same thing can happen after management network fail and so on.
> Maybe we can run a quartz job every x minutes, checking if a large part of
> the hosts in the cluster (like 30%) are untrusted - in that case run the
> aggregated query.
are we sure this optimization is needed?
how heavy/latent is the call to the attestation service?