From: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske(a)mittwald.de>
To: devel(a)ovirt.org, "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:44:17 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Building vdsm within Fedora
On 24/09/14 09:13, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
> You probably missed the first part "we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in
> the spec file". In that case you won't fail in any requirement.
>
> Basically the question is: was there any problem on centos6 before
> committing
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/31214 ?
Of course there was a problem, please follow the link in this very
commit to the according bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127763
In short: you can not use live snapshots without this updated spec file.
And it's a PITA to install this package by hand, you must track
it's versions yourself etc pp. you basically lose all the stuff
a proper spec file gives you.
PS: I also don't get the "we want to get vdsm in every distribution"
a) it was never in any distro, it was in epel, which is a third party
repository anyway, so you can just provide it via ovirt repo imho.
b) no one packages vdsm for debian, ubuntu, gentoo, arch, suse,
$nameyourdistro or I completely missed it, so why treat fedora
in a special way? Don't misunderstand me, it would be cool if you
have packages for every distro, or even bsd based stuff, but I think
this is still a long way.
c) will anyone use vdsm without ovirt? is this even possible?
so imho you need ovirt repos anyway?
People think that distribution is monolithic.
While in fact most, including fedora, are modular.
Alon