... and let's not call this CPU overcommit feature. It's
nothing like that - it's "Hyperthread handling"
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Grinberg" <simon(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Greg Padgett" <gpadgett(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 1:13:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] CPU Overcommit Feature
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Greg Padgett" <gpadgett(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 4:37:57 PM
>> Subject: [Engine-devel] CPU Overcommit Feature
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been working on a feature to allow CPU Overcommitment of hosts
>> in a
>> cluster. This first stage allows the engine to consider host cpu
>> threads
>> as cores for the purposes of VM resource allocation.
>>
>> This wiki page has further details, your comments are welcome!
>>
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/cpu_overcommit
>
> Basically looking good.
> Hyperthread though is vendor specific.
>
> For AMD it's Clustered Multi-Thread while for Intel it's Hyper-Thread
> Official name is simultaneous multithreading (SMT) but no one
> outside of the academy will recognize that.
>
> in libvirt if I read it right it's <attribute
name='thread_siblings'>
>
> So why not just call it threads.
> We'll have cpuSockets, cpiCores, and cpuThreads, should be clear when
> in CPU context.
>
> In the GUI just change hyperthreads to CPU threads. While in the tool
> tip explain that it's either AMD Clustered Multi-Thread or Intel
> Hyperthread
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Greg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
Thanks Simon and Andrew. I've moved the wiki page [1] (with a redirect at
the old name), updated the terms within to not be vendor-specific, and
will do the same with the implementation.
[1]