On 03/18/2012 10:39 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/18/2012 10:43 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 03/18/2012 10:21 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 03/18/2012 09:33 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
the question is Management/Migration/Storage/Display can be non-bridged?, if so, <bridged>true|false</bridged> makes sense.
bridge is an implementation detail at host level, hence the discussion is about abstracting it from users. a VM network doesn't have to have bridge at host level, for networks using VMFex or SR-IOV
<network> <designation>Management|Migration|Storage|Display|VM</designation> </network>
what do you say about having it as another /designation/ type?
it==VM? the above looks ok to me. (I really hope for a better element name than designation though)
I'd avoid using /type/ as type usually applies on single variant, /assignment/ maybe? nothing batter comes to my mind -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D