On 05/30/2014 01:07 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tomas Jelinek" <tjelinek(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 8:17:27 AM
>
> Hey all,
>
> in the instance type feature [1] there are two parts, the "instance types"
> (HW part of the machine) and the "something not sure how to call" (which
is
> basically a disk image with some SW related metadata like OS type). It is
> inspired by the Amazon's "Instance Type" + "AMI".
>
> Currently, the handling of the HW part is merged upstream (some small parts
> missing but mostly there) but the software part is not. I'd like to start
> implementing it and wanted to ask the community how to call it. Normally it
> would be called "image", but since we already have images in oVirt it
would
> be confusing.
>
> I see this options how to call it, please feel free to comment on them, vote
> for some or propose a new name (please keep in mind that the HW part is
> called "Instance Type").
>
> - Instance Image
> - Software Profile
> - OMI (oVirt Machine Image)
IMO, any of the three above will do.
> - System Image
this is too confusing - we already have 'System' in the application (e.g. the
'System' tree, 'System' permissions, etc.) and we already have
'Image' in the
application (in multiple places, actually, which is confusing already).
Introducing a new 'System Image' type that has nothing to do with the existing
'System' or with the existing 'Image' is very confusing.
> - ITI (Instance Type Image)
this is confusing as well since it might be considered part / sub-type of the
Instance Types business entity, which is wrong.
And why not image?
>
> Thank you,
> Tomas
>
>
> [1]:
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Instance_Types
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel