Re: [ovirt-devel] Registration duplication?

On 07/22/2015 09:42 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > > Hey, > > I've seen that some new code landed to support Engine registration > using the generic registration approach. > > But it seem that we now have two implementations: > > 1. vdsm-tool register [0] > 2. ovirt-register [1] > > To reduce code duplication I'd suggest to drop one of these approaches > before we enter 3.6. > Or are there reasons for keeping both of them? I believe not.

> My take is to keep ovirt-register which is independent and would allow > us to add plain hosts to Engine (host-deploy is then taking care of > the rest IIUIC). > The vdsm-tool approach reuqires vdsm to be installed. > > Thoughts? +1 for dropping vdsm-tool register verb. It started as alternative and later we merged everything in ovirt-register project which is the generic registration. I can send a patch to drop it soon.