On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
<snip>
>>>
>>>
>>> Improvement of the Guest Agent:
>>>
>>>As part of the proposed solution it is necessary to improve the
>>>guest agent as well.
>>Improving the agent may be a good idea, but I do not see the necessity
>>in it.
The guest agent is doing 'expensive' queries (e.g.
"application_list") way too often. And things like network
interfaces, disk usage and installed applications won't usually
change every n minutes.
Those queries could be much more reactive then proactive.
Of course, but as I said:
>>It's also important to improve the horrible
multithreaded
>>vdsm/libvirt statistics acquisition, but just as unrelated to the core
>>of this feature.
I think it is misleading to include this in the discussion about
vdsm/Engine interface change.