On 04/18/2012 09:51 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
Ever wondered why the version of oVirt's first release is 3.0.0_0001? The answer is simple - We use ovirt-engine jar's version as our "main" release version.
Personally, I think the current versioning scheme is ugly. Actually, I can't name even one open-source project using "_" in it's version.
What can we do about it? We have couple of options: 1. Leave the engine alone, and use a separate versioning scheme (e.g - use just 3.1.0 as the main version for next release) 2. Remove "_" from engine jars 3. Do nothing.
I'd like to hear your thoughts, as well as the reasons to use such an unusual versioning scheme.
--- Ofer Schreiber oVirt Release Manager _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
From my point of view using the 0001 suffix in the names of the jar files is not a big problem, but I agree that using it in the release number is ugly, and it produces issues/discussions during packaging. I vote for option #1: use 3.1.0 for the next main version.
-- Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.