Yep, good question. Most Unix/linux sysadmins prefer syslog, whatever we have on the
java+jboss side.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Choate" <jchoate(a)redhat.com>
To: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 3:16:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] logging in engine
On 11/18/2011 06:42 AM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In oVirt's logging configuration we direct org.ovirt.* loggers to
> the engine log appender, org.ovirt.engine.ui to the ui's log and
> then the rest to the server log.
> The difficulties come when you start to do cross-component
> debugging. E.g. you see the logs of the engine in the engine log,
> but you would also like to see the logs of the components the
> engine is building upon: persistence API's (jdbc, hibernate)
> network communication components (e.g. httpclient, vdsm, ssh
> client), data processing API's (xml or json-parsers, apache
> commons apis) and all these logs go to the generic engine log. So
> when debugging you would have to merge these logs, otherwise you
> may miss some important details.
>
> I believe Moti's patch
>
(
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#patch,sidebyside,257,3,backend/manager/conf/jbos...)
> is one step in the another (I believe more useful) direction.
> But rather than specifying all the components that the engine uses,
> wouldn't it make sense to take just let all the logs flow into a
> single appender?
>
> What is your opinion?
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
Has any consideration been given to using the syslog appender and
sending all messages there? Most data centers already have tools in
place for analyzing the contents of syslog.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel