3 Apr
2014
3 Apr
'14
6:04 a.m.
Why not move it to vds_static? On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik <gchaplik@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi list,
I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables: - vds_dynamic - vds_on_boot We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once the host is booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it. In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on migrate all non-dynamic host data (cpu, os, etc.).
thoughts?
Thanks, Gilad. _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel