Why not move it to vds_static?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik <gchaplik(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi list,
I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables:
- vds_dynamic
- vds_on_boot
We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once the
host is booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it.
In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on migrate
all non-dynamic host data (cpu, os, etc.).
thoughts?
Thanks,
Gilad.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel