Top posting
1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability
will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
this decision. (as Niels stated)
2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly
the best outcome for this issue
Shyam
On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>>> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
safe to
>>>> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
>>>>
>>>> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3:
>>>> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
>>>>
>>>> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
>>>> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd
which
>>>> should work with current oVirt code.
>>>
>>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
>>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Niels
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
>>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
>>
>> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
>> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
>
> We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
> the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
> from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
> few days?
>
> Niels
>