
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Moti Asayag <masayag@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Oved Ourfali <oourfali@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi
I think it was premature.
I still see a lot of bugs to be fixed in 3.6.1. See query:
And if looking only at blockers and exceptions I see 25 bugs still on new/assigned/post.
Why not to do the branching later, when we get it more stable or push bugs out of it?
+1, are there any stabilization criteria to determine when a code base is considered stabilized enough for branching ?
The branch is supposed to be the place where stabilization happen. The criteria is branch whenever a build is required. I've been asked to issue a build this morning so I branched. Too bad the request has been retired in the afternoon.
Thanks, Oved
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, just an heads up we branched for 3.6.1 stabilization this morning. If you have patches targeted to 3.6.1 you now need to cherry-pick them to 3.6.1 branch too. A build is scheduled for today at 2 PM TLV time.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Regards, Moti
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com