On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:22 AM Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
We used Fedora 29 for working on incremental backup, since we need to work with upstream libvirt and qemu and it was easy to build on Fedora, and vdsm was not ready on python 3. We are moving now to Fedora 30/python 3 for incremental backup, and so far it seems to work fine for adding a host and doing virt-v2v imports. Eyal, can you update if current incremental patches work on Fedora 30? Having some python 2 build is also useful for keeping the source compatible with python 2, to make backporting to 4.3 easier. This reason is still true even if we stop using it for development, but since Fedora 29 will be EOL in 2 weeks it seems that we need to get rid of this build soon. We still have el7 build, but this build can break soon as well since we need to make changes in lvm and multipath configuration will not be compatible with CentOS 7, and we don't want to waste time on creating compatible configurations at build time or runtime, since nobody needs this. So it looks like we need to get rid of python 2 builds now. Nir
Thanks, michal _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/TWX7LC4SHDEHT4...