Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] Getting rid of arch@ovirt.org?
----- Original Message -----
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 04:53:04AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for cross-posting, but in this case I think it's relevant.
>
> The original idea was that every time we wish to discuss a new
> cross-component feature we should do it over arch list. However,
> it would appear that de-facto usually engine-devel and vdsm-devel
> are being used (cross posted).
> Currently engine-devel has 211 subscribers, arch has 160 and
> vdsm-devel has 128 so from this perspective again, arch seems less
> relevant.
> I propose we ditch arch and keep the other 2 mailing lists.
> I'm not sure whether new cross-component features should be
> discussed solely on engine-devel or cross-posted (there are
> probably people who wouldn't care about engine side but would
> still like to know about such changes).
+1 to ditching arch. I would still prefer that cross-component
features
cross-post to vdsm-devel and engine-devel. My current focus is on
vdsm and the
traffic level on that list is currently far more manageable than that
of
engine-devel.
That's my sentiment as well (plus I have a rule to drop duplicates so I don't care
much about it ;)
--
Adam Litke <agl(a)us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center