Re: [Engine-devel] Forward comp[atibility of OVF
On 22/03/12 11:04, Mike Kolesnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to know if we want to support forward compatibility of OVF
> format, which is used for export/import of VMs/VM Templates.
>
> For example,
> I create a VM in a 3.1 system, export it to an export Domain.
> Should I be able to import this VM on a 3.0 system?
>
I think we should support only backwards compatibility no need for
forward compatibility.
The question is should we block importing such a VM (that it's
version
is not something the engine identifies) I think we should block it
otherwise the engine will import the VM which can fail sometimes with
errors like NullPointerException which will end-up being filed as a
BZ.
I agree that this should be blocked, however to do so for older versions will require
extra work that i don't know if we need or not..
> Obviously, backwards compatibility (from older version to newer) is
> desired and is kept, but do we really need forward compatibility
> also?
>
> The reason I'm asking is some changes that need to be done in
> current
> OVF format to support new features. These new changes will be
> backwards-compatible with old OVF formats, but is it desirable for
> them
> to be forward compatible?
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel