In the interest of moving forward, let's agree that, since there seems to be an overwhelming majority for option 1 (see below), then if by the start of next week (i.e Monday, April 23) no one will object to option 1, I will start the implementation. Thanks, Ori.
Current summary:
There are four options for Floating-Disks modelling: two that were previously discussed, and two that were recently added by Livnat, using PUT. See full list of options below.
Itamar, Geert, Einav & Ori are currently pro option #1 (if anyone changed his mind - please say so). Does anyone strongly prefer another option, or can we move forward with option #1?
Thanks,
Ori.
1) POST /api/vms/{vm:id}/disks <disk id="{disk:id}"/> => attach disk
DELETE /api/vms/{vm:id}/disks/{disk:id} <disk><detach>true</detach><disk> => detach disk
2)
POST /api/vms/{vm:id}/disks <disk id="{disk:id}"/> => attach disk
DELETE /api/vms/{vm:id}/disks/{disk:id}/detach => detach disk
3) PUT /api/vms/{vm:id}/disks (update on the disks collection) => attach + detach
4) PUT /api/disks/{disk:id} (update on the vm-id's of disk) => attach + detach
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel