[ovirt-devel] Re: Build failed - TestPyWatch.test_kill_grandkids() did someone encounter this failure?

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:43 PM Eyal Shenitzky <eshenitz(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Did someone encounter this failure? > > *12:05:19* 0.00s teardown tests/pywatch_test.py::TestPyWatch::test_kill_grandkids*12:05:19* =================================== FAILURES ===================================*12:05:19* ______________________ TestPyWatch.test_timeout_backtrace ______________________*12:05:19* *12:05:19* self = <pywatch_test.TestPyWatch object at 0x7f0f730219d0>*12:05:19* *12:05:19* @pytest.mark.xfail(on_fedora(), reason="py-bt is broken on Fedora 27")*12:05:19* def test_timeout_backtrace(self):*12:05:19* script = '''*12:05:19* import time*12:05:19* *12:05:19* def outer():*12:05:19* inner()*12:05:19* *12:05:19* def inner():*12:05:19* time.sleep(10)*12:05:19* *12:05:19* outer()*12:05:19* '''*12:05:19* rc, out, err = exec_cmd(['./py-watch', '0.1', 'python', '-c', script])*12:05:19* > assert b'in inner ()' in out*12:05:19* E AssertionError: assert 'in inner ()' in '=============================================================\n= Watched process timed out ... Terminating watched process =\n=============================================================\n'*12:05:19* *12:05:19* pywatch_test.py:68: AssertionError*12:05:19* ------------------------------ Captured log call -------------------------------*12:05:19* cmdutils.py 151 DEBUG ./py-watch 0.1 python -c '*12:05:19* import time*12:05:19* *12:05:19* def outer():*12:05:19* inner()*12:05:19* *12:05:19* def inner():*12:05:19* time.sleep(10)*12:05:19* *12:05:19* outer()*12:05:19* ' (cwd None)*12:05:19* cmdutils.py 159 DEBUG FAILED: <err> = 'Missing separate debuginfo for /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/.tox/lib-py27/bin/python2.7\nTry: yum --enablerepo=\'*debug*\' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/db/43afedf61f35fbdf896c13894b501cb8bf1dad.debug\nUndefined command: "py-bt". Try "help".\n'; <rc> = 143 > > This used to work on el7. Does it fail in a consistent way now? Moving the discussion to devel, this is not storage specific. Nir >