Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it
explicitly, so I'll just go with that.
If someone feels strongly against, please reply.
Ori
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Pasternak" <mpastern(a)redhat.com>
To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Ori Liel" <oliel(a)redhat.com>, engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 2:26:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
On 05/15/2012 05:31 PM, Moti Asayag wrote:
On 05/14/2012 02:19 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
> > No decision about the name of the parameter yet, and this is blocking me.
> >
> > Names that were suggested so far:
> >
> > * flow-id
+1
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D