9:30 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20:55 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> > <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > > > <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > >
> > > > On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > > > >> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >>>> From: "Itamar Heim"
<iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >>>> To: "David Caro"
<dcaroest(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >>>> Cc: "engine-devel"
<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
> > > > >>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM
> > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim
wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches.
> > > > >>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were
not touched over 60 days
> > > > >>>>>> (to
> > > > >>>>>> begin with, I think the number should
actually be lower).
> > > > >>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any
interested party post
> > > > >>>>>> their
> > > > >>>>>> closure.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list
should actually get
> > > > >>>>>> attention,
> > > > >>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a
"lot of old patches"
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> thoughts?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>> Itamar
> > > > >>>>>>
_______________________________________________
> > > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list
> > > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > > >>>>>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that
checks the age
> > > > >>>>> of
> > > > >>>>> the
> > > > >>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the
reviewers and the
> > > > >>>>> maintainer,
> > > > >>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain
period just
> > > > >>>>> abandons
> > > > >>>>> it.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or
all
> > > > >>>> subscribed
> > > > >>>> to
> > > > >>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days
or something
> > > > >>>> like
> > > > >>>> that.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This will be annoying.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> And there are patches that pending with good reason.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment,
no
> > > > >> rebase,
> > > > >> nothing)?
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:maste...
> > > >
> > > > so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any
> > > > comment
> > > > from any reviewer.
> > > > lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than
> > > > let
> > > > them get old and stay forever
> > >
> > > Again... maintainer can close these if he likes.
> > > Owner can close these if he likes.
> >
> > right, but why?
> > a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into
> > motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc).
> > I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
> >
>
> I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with
> its
> contributers.
I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're
saying.
Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could
actually spur those interactions into motion.
You prefer machines to interact with contributers to kick them in motion.
I believe that human interaction and discussion between maintainer and contributer is the
way to go.
It is much more polite and cooperative for maintainer that is not aware of anything
blocking a progress to kindly interact with contributer and finally close the change if
contributer is unresponsive and/or change has no value.
>
> > >
> > > The problem is that maintainers avoid closing.
> > > And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and
> > > gone.
> > >
> > > So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
> > >
> > > 1. If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short
> > > cycle
> > > (can be even a week).
> > > 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor
progress.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Alon
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > vdsm-devel mailing list
> > > vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> > >
> >
>