
22 Jul
2015
22 Jul
'15
3:42 p.m.
Hey, I've seen that some new code landed to support Engine registration using the generic registration approach. But it seem that we now have two implementations: 1. vdsm-tool register [0] 2. ovirt-register [1] To reduce code duplication I'd suggest to drop one of these approaches before we enter 3.6. Or are there reasons for keeping both of them? My take is to keep ovirt-register which is independent and would allow us to add plain hosts to Engine (host-deploy is then taking care of the rest IIUIC). The vdsm-tool approach reuqires vdsm to be installed. Thoughts? Greetings fabian --- [0] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/40966/ [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-register.git