On 02/26/2012 02:38 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/26/2012 02:05 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 10:06 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I modified the Wiki pages of this feature:
>>
>>
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/CloneVmFromSnapshot
>>
>>
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/DetailedCloneVmFromSnapshot
>>
>> Comments are more than welcome
>
> 1. "Shared disks and direct LUN diskes behavior - For shared disks and
> direct LUN based disks, the user who performs the snapshot will specify
> during snapshot creation whether the disk should be plugged or unplugged
> upon performing the clone."
>
> direct lun - if it is not already in shared mode, cannot be used by more
> than one VM, hence should not be cloned, unless already flagged as shared.
Understood. What should be the behavior if shared flag is set to false?
warning to audit log that the disk isn't part of the clone.
>
> 2. it sounds like there should be some general code shared for import vm
> and clone vm for handling items which can't be duplicate by default
> (say, mac addresses).
True, I will revisit this. Aren't we facing actually this issue also in
creating a VM from template?
I assume it already has such logic. I'm suggesting to check how
redundant it is across the various commands (if it is), before creating
another care.
>
> 3. MLA - are you cloning the permissions on the VM as well, or only
> creating an owner permission on the new entity?
>
> 4. MLA - what permission does one need to have on source VM/snapsot to
> clone it?
> if a non-owner can clone a VM/snapshot, and become owner of the new
> entity, need to make sure no privilege escalation flows exist.
> is the intent to share the code of clone VM with AddVm (which is what
> clone is), with a task to clone the disks rather than create them
> (otherwise you need to duplicate the code for quota and permission
> handling?)
If I understand you correctly - Cloning images commands
(AddVmFromTemplate, cloning vm from snapshot, etc..) will invoke a
CopyImage internal command.
iiuc, internal commands don't perform permission checks?