2:36 a.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030205080202090500000907
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thanks for the confirmation. Appending a template for the columns :-)
/psql engine -U postgres -c "SELECT 'COMMENT ON COLUMN ' || table_name
|| '.' || column_name || ' IS TODO;' sql FROM information_schema.columns
where table_schema='public' order by table_name, column_name" >
comments_columns_to_do.sql//
/
It looks like we have cca 73 tables and 2353 columns now. So probably
better to start with the tables.
On 26.2.2013 15:03, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
I think your idea is very good.
I also think we should have it for columns as well.
But since we already have many columns, maybe we should have an "on
going effort" from various developers on this (i.e - each developer
will do that for several tables).
Thoughts?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Libor Spevak" <lspevak(a)redhat.com>
*To: *engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:37:17 PM
*Subject: *[Engine-devel] Engine table comments
Hi,
I would like to propose to create a patch assigning sql comment to
each Engine table.
The comments will be a part of the exported DB schema report, too.
The terminology is not always consistent across all application
layers, so for the newcomers it would be easier to understand the
model.
But, what would be general guidelines?
I recommend to use singular form of entity name as used from
end-user point of view (if somehow visible, of course), or just
used frequently inside code.
Examples:
storage_pool ... Data center
vds_groups ... Cluster
but:
vm_static ... Virtual machine configuration
vm_dynamic ... Virtual machine runtime data
vm_statistics ... Virtual machine statistics data
...
etc.
This command prepares a template for the patch:
/psql engine -U postgres -c "select 'COMMENT ON TABLE ' || relname
|| ' IS ''TODO'';' sql from pg_stat_user_tables t WHERE
schemaname='public' order by t.relname" > comments_to_do.sql//
/
or just I can prepare a page on the wiki with table containing
table names and volunteers :-) can propose simple understandable
comments for known tables.
Is it useful?
Thanks.
Regards,
Libor
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
--------------030205080202090500000907
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Thanks for the confirmation. Appending
a template for the columns :-)<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<i>psql engine -U postgres -c "SELECT 'COMMENT ON COLUMN ' ||
table_name || '.' || column_name || ' IS TODO;' sql FROM
information_schema.columns where table_schema='public' order by
table_name, column_name" >
comments_columns_to_do.sql</i><i><br>
</i><br>
It looks like we have cca 73 tables and 2353 columns now. So
probably better to start with the tables.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 26.2.2013 15:03, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1733089166.8628739.1361887395043.JavaMail.root@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css">p { margin: 0; }</style>
<div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">I think your idea is very good.
<div>I also think we should have it for columns as well.</div>
<div>But since we already have many columns, maybe we should
have an "on going effort" from various developers on this (i.e
- each developer will do that for several tables).</div>
<div>Thoughts?</div>
<div><br>
<br>
<hr id="zwchr">
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16, 16,
255);margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From:
</b>"Libor Spevak" <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:lspevak@redhat.com"><lspevak@redhat.com></a><br>
<b>To: </b><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:engine-devel@ovirt.org">engine-devel@ovirt.org</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:37:17 PM<br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Engine-devel] Engine table comments<br>
<br>
Hi, <br>
I would like to propose to create a patch assigning sql
comment to each Engine table.<br>
The comments will be a part of the exported DB schema
report, too.<br>
The terminology is not always consistent across all
application layers, so for the newcomers it would be easier
to understand the model.<br>
<br>
But, what would be general guidelines?<br>
<br>
I recommend to use singular form of entity name as used from
end-user point of view (if somehow visible, of course), or
just used frequently inside code.<br>
<br>
Examples:<br>
storage_pool ... Data center<br>
vds_groups ... Cluster<br>
but:<br>
vm_static ... Virtual machine configuration<br>
vm_dynamic ... Virtual machine runtime data<br>
vm_statistics ... Virtual machine statistics data<br>
...<br>
etc.<br>
<br>
This command prepares a template for the patch:<br>
<br>
<i>psql engine -U postgres -c "select 'COMMENT ON TABLE '
||
relname || ' IS ''TODO'';' sql from
pg_stat_user_tables t
WHERE schemaname='public' order by t.relname" >
comments_to_do.sql</i><i><br>
</i><br>
or just I can prepare a page on the wiki with table
containing table names and volunteers :-) can propose simple
understandable comments for known tables.<br>
<br>
Is it useful?<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Libor<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Engine-devel mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Engine-devel@ovirt.org">Engine-devel@ovirt.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel">...
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------030205080202090500000907--