Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt CI now supports Fedora 27 and Fedora Rawhide

Yes, I can do that.

17.11.2017 21:27 "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; napisał(a): > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:36 AM Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 15 October 2017 at 19:43, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Down sides are waste of resources, slower CI responsiveness, and more >> >> importantly: rawhide fragility may cause more unrelated failures. >> > >> > >> > I don't think it will be that much of a resource issue. Our non-peak >> slave >> > utilization is pretty low. And you can just remove some of the older >> Fedora >> > versions. >> > >> > I suggest not to make too many premature assumptions. If rawhide >> testing is >> > useful for you, just add it and see how it behaves over time... >> > >> >> Nir, with your experience - does it worth it? >> >> >> >> How about having "rawhide" as non-voting? >> > >> > >> > You can accomplish that easily - just add a 'check-patch.sh.fcraw' >> script >> > that would source the normal 'check-patch.sh' and throw away the >> process >> > return value. >> >> This would eliminate the only benefit I see in having rawhide at all: >> I'd like to see the rawhide job in RED if it is currently broken, so I >> can look deeper to see why. If it's always green, it's useless to me. >> However, if it is often red due to temporary unrelated changes, I >> would not like it to block fixes. >> >> But as you say, we can try it out and check the signal/noise ratio. >> > > I sent patches for ovirt-imageio, we need similar patches for vdsm. > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/84309/ > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/84308/ > > Piotr, can you handle this for vdsm? > > Nir > >