12:42 p.m.
As I had another failure of this today I will be disabling this test until
issue is resolved (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1684267)
Thanks,
Dafna
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:48 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:52 AM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a failure on the project in basic suite, master branch. The
> recent failure was in patch:
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98087/1 - Add pre-seed for ovirt-web-ui
>
> CQ is pointing at the below as the root cause (which was merged a while
> back):
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/97491/ - Add pre-seed for ovirt-web-ui
>
> Can you please check the issue as it seems both patches are changing the
> same thing and the project seem to be broken since
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/97491/3
>
> Latest failure:
> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/13171/
>
> Logs:
>
>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/13171/arti...
>
> errors from logs:
> Engine:
>
> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,479-05 ERROR
> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand] (default task-1) [74283e25]
> Transaction rolled-back for command
> 'org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand'.
> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,483-05 ERROR
> [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
> (default task-1) [74283e25] EVENT_ID: USER_FAILED_UPDATE_VM(58), Failed to
> update VM vm2 (User: admin@inter
> nal-authz).
> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,485-05 INFO
> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand] (default task-1) [74283e25]
> Lock freed to object 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[vm2=VM_NAME]',
> sharedLocks='[3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea
> 02d9f6adee=VM]'}'
> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,485-05 DEBUG
> [org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor]
> (default task-1) [74283e25] method: runAction, params: [UpdateVm,
> VmManagementParametersBase:{commandId='340
> 59769-05b9-429e-8356-f6b9b9953f55', user='admin',
commandType='UpdateVm',
> vmId='3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee'}], timeElapsed: 6618ms
> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,486-05 ERROR
> [org.ovirt.engine.api.restapi.resource.AbstractBackendResource] (default
> task-1) [] Operation Failed: []
> 2019-02-27 13:37:28,579-05 DEBUG
> [org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor]
> (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-85) [] method: get, params:
> [e29c0ba1-464c-4eb4-a8f2-c6933d9
> 9969a], timeElapsed: 3ms
>
>
> vdsm:
>
> 2019-02-27 13:37:21,987-0500 INFO (jsonrpc/1) [vdsm.api] FINISH
> lease_info error=No such lease 3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee
> from=::ffff:192.168.201.4,43920,
> flow_id=117dec74-ad59-4b12-8148-b2c130337c10,
> task_id=9c297d41-0aa7-4c74-b268-b710e666bc6c (api:52)
> 2019-02-27 13:37:21,988-0500 ERROR (jsonrpc/1) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
> (Task='9c297d41-0aa7-4c74-b268-b710e666bc6c') Unexpected error (task:875)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882,
> in _run
> return fn(*args, **kargs)
> File "<string>", line 2, in lease_info
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in
> method
> ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 3702,
> in lease_info
> info = dom.lease_info(lease.lease_id)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 674,
> in lease_info
> return vol.lookup(lease_id)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/xlease.py", line
> 553, in lookup
> raise NoSuchLease(lease_id)
> NoSuchLease: No such lease 3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee
>
This is not an error of vdsm. Someone asked for information about a
non-existing lease,
and vdsm fail the request with the expected error:
NoSuchLease: No such lease 3500eb82-e5e2-4e24-b41c-ea02d9f6adee
But since the error is not a public error, vdsm logger handle it as
unexpected error and
create lot of noise in vdsm log.
On engine side, this creates even worse noise, as we can see here:
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/13171/arti...
(look for 2019-02-27 13:37:21,996-05)
All these noise could be avoided if vdsm was using a proper public error.
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1684267
But, this error is not related to the actual failing test, this is just
noise hiding the real problem.
Thanks for reporting this.
Nir