On 02/14/2012 09:59 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/14/2012 09:48 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yair Zaslavsky"<yzaslavs@redhat.com> To: engine-devel@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:20:10 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
On 02/14/2012 08:59 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the plan document for autorecovery. > http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like the preferred behavior?
I think that by default Laszlo meant in the upgrade process to maintain current behavior.
Why? Why not improve their user experience and provide them with such feature? Current behaviour sucks - as your system admin.
I agree that for new entities the default should be true.
i think the only combination which will allow this is for db to default to false and code to default to true for this property? Why can't we during upgrade process set to all existing entities in DB the value to false, but still have the column defined as "default true"? why all the trouble? i think this field should be mandatory as any other field, user has to specify it during the entity creation, right where he provide the name and any other field for the new entity. Fine by me.
I'm not sure I see the reason a user would want to turn it off, on a per-object basis. If it's in the 'Advanced' settings of a host/storage, fine, but otherwise, it's just another cryptic feature to turn on/off. Y.
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel