Yaniv,
Work public interface definition is covered by [1].
Thanks,
Piotr
[1]
Do we have a RFE on this?
Yaniv Dary
Technical Product Manager
Red Hat Israel Ltd.
34 Jerusalem Road
Building A, 4th floor
Ra'anana, Israel 4350109
Tel : +972 (9) 7692306
8272306
Email: ydary(a)redhat.com
IRC : ydary
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> Il 29/Mar/2016 20:12, "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Il 29/Mar/2016 20:02, "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> ha
scritto:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> In the Vdsm call, we discussed a way to expose vdsm errors to its
> clients
> > >> (e.g, engine, hosted engine agent/setup).
> > >>
> > >> The idea is to have a vdsmapi package, holding:
> > >> - errors.py - all public errors
> > >> - events.py - all events sent by vdsm
> > >> - client.py - library for communicating with vdsm
> > >> - schema.py - the client will use this to autogenerate online help
> and
> > >> validate messages
> > >> - schema.yaml - we probably need several files (gluster, events,
> etc.)
> > >>
> > >> This will allow other projects talking with vdsm to do:
> > >>
> > >> from vdsmapi import client, errors
> > >> ...
> > >> try:
> > >> client.list(vmId="xxxyyy")
> > >> except errors.NoSuchVM:
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >> (this is a fake example, the real api may be different)
> > >>
> > >> Engine can build-require vdsmapi, and generate java module with the
> > >> public errors from
> > >> vdsmapi/errors.py module, instead of keeping this hardcoded in
> engine,
> > >> and updating
> > >> it every time vdsm adds new public error.
> > >>
> > >> Vdsm will use this package when building response to clients.
> > >>
> > >> Edi was concerned about sharing the errors module, so maybe we need a
> > >> package:
> > >>
> > >> vdsmapi/
> > >> errors/
> > >> network.py
> > >> virt.py
> > >> storage.py
> > >> gluster.py
> > >>
> > >> We can still expose all the errors via errors/__init__.py, so clients
> > >> do not have to care about
> > >> the area of the application the error come from.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >
> > > For which version is this proposal targeted? 4.1?
> >
> > This is not targeted to any version yet, but I would be happy if we can
> do this
> > for next release.
>
> I don't see it fitting 4.0 scope but I agree it would be nice to have in
> 4.1.
>
> >
> > Nir
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>