12 Mar
2015
12 Mar
'15
3:02 p.m.
Hi!
what about embedding <vm> inside the pool? then it will have also template inside, and also correlate to the real implementation of the pool in the backend
That doesn't have any of the two adverse effects that I described, so looks good.
OK, so I'm going forward with new <vm> element inside <vm_pool>. Thank you for comments. -- Shmuel