Both are merged, let's see how OST fares
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Allon Mureinik <amureini(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
I merged 83920 with dependencies. Perhaps gerrit doesn't handle
such
chains properly (or perhaps our CI is misusing the API?).
WRT current issues, posted two patches upstream:
-
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83986/ - fixes the GWT build that was
broken this morning, preventing a proper build altogether
-
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83987/ - should fix the OST regression you
noted.
I'm waiting for the CI to finish running on both and will merge.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 13 November 2017 at 11:10, Allon Mureinik <amureini(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Commit 86bf82e746404145e8b97df46f514086e4f82e69 is probably the
> offending
> > commit, taking a deeper look now, should have a fix within the hour
> >
>
> Hmm, I see what happened there, that commit is
>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/83920, so it was tested at:
>
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/3769
> and passed.
>
> BUT, it was tested along with
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/83918/2
> that was merged earlier as far as git ordering goes, but somehow was
> assumed to be a later patch. When we test multiple patches from the
> same project we essentially use packages built from the one we deem to
> be the latest. So in this case only the packages from 83918 were
> actually tested.
>
> We went to great lengths to preserve correct patch ordering by
> preserving the order of event notifications reaching us from gerrit.
> But here it seems we ended out with out-of-order patches. Do you have
> any idea how did we end up with this? Do you remember what was the
> sequence in which you clicked the 'merge' button on the different
> patches?
>
> --
> Barak Korren
> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
> Red Hat EMEA
>
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. |
redhat.com/trusted
>