Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com> writes:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:37 AM Anton Marchukov
<amarchuk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello Milan.
>
> We do not necessary need it earlier, but we want to have some date in
> mind, so we can plan our CI work accordingly.
>
> Any thoughts for engine? Should it also target Feb 18?
>
On Feb 19th we should release oVirt 4.3.1 RC (4.3.1 GA na Feb 26th along
with RHV 4.3 beta 2), so I'd say let's branch after the final 4.3.1 build
...
I believe we needn't branch out Vdsm and Engine on the same date, right?
So we can branch out Vdsm earlier than Engine, around Feb 18-19, is it
OK?
>> Anton.
>>
>> > On 4 Feb 2019, at 15:41, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Anton Marchukov <amarchuk(a)redhat.com> writes:
>> >
>> >> Since oVirt 4.3.0 released are we ready to branch master into 4.3?
>> >
>> > Regarding Vdsm, there is still an ongoing storage work for 4.3 and no
>> > really strong pressure for branching out 4.3 I'm aware of. For that
>> > reason, Vdsm developers have agreed that we could create Vdsm ovirt-4.3
>> > branch on February 18 (and no significantly later than that). If the
>> > branch is needed earlier for infra or other reasons, we can make it.
>> > Storage work would have to be backported, but that can be mostly trivial
>> > if an initial master-merge rush is avoided.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Milan
>>
>> --
>> Anton Marchukov
>> Team Lead - Release Management - RHV DevOps - Red Hat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>