From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>, "Eli Mesika"
<emesika(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 4:13:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Share Your Thoughts
On 03/23/2014 04:01 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
>
>
> Thanks,
> Gilad.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
>> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 3:35:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Share Your Thoughts
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 2:41:15 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Share Your Thoughts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 2:36:17 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Share Your Thoughts
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 2:06:01 PM
>>>>> Subject: [Engine-devel] Share Your Thoughts
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Devel Community Members,
>>>>>
>>>>> We are having a small discussion on patch:
>>>>>
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/25633/,
>>>>> bug 1065753 - "Maintenance operations on a VM would ask for an
optional
>>>>> reason" (adding a note to stop/shutdown VM, that will be
cleared when
>>>>> the
>>>>> VM
>>>>> go up).
>>>>>
>>>>> The proposed solution is to add a free text field in the VM entity,
and
>>>>> to
>>>>> update it in command's parameters (StopVmParmas.. etc.).
>>>>>
>>>>> I think slightly different, my alternative is to enhance the
current
>>>>> free
>>>>> text (comment field) into XML, and allow to add multiple comments
that
>>>>> include types.
>>>>> You are welcome to read more about it in the patch's comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> I suggest a third approach
>>>> We are logging here a reason for a user/admin operation
>>>> The natural place for such information is the audit log and not the VM
>>>> tables.
>>>> I think that the audit log messages related for the stop/shutdown
>>>> commands
>>>> should be enhanced to include a {REASON} field then the command itself
>>>> will
>>>> replace this value in the message with the one given by the user and we
>>>> are
>>>> done.
>>>> Again, the required information is a pure logging issue, therefor I
>>>> suggest
>>>> to put this information in the correct place for it, there is no point
>>>> in
>>>> saving any logging messages in any entity table.
>>>>
>>>> Technically:
>>>> 1) The option for giving a reason should be configurable (per Cluster
if
>>>> I
>>>> look at Arthur comment in the BZ)
>>>> 2) If the option is on than any stop/shutdown will ask for reason and
>>>> sent
>>>> it
>>>> in the command parameters
>>> than=>then
>>>> 3) If the command succeed and got a non-empty reason , it will set the
>>>> reason
>>>> in the command audit log message
>>>>
>>>
>>> 4) We gain here additional advantage since we can :
>>> a) search for the reason using the search engine
>>> b) get the reason in the message text sent to us if we are subscribed
>>> for
>>> the VM stop/shotdown event ans using engine-notifier
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eli
>>>>
>>
>> +1
>> sounds like a good and simple idea
>
> +1, BUT this is completely a different feature, and more difficult (MUCH
> more, if I may add).
> IMHO we need both, lets start with the no-brainer.
AuditLog gets recycled after 30 days. the reason i stopped my VM may
still be relevant.
I would not make fields complex/composite. they need to be easily
useable via the CLI for example.
I think we need multiple comments, so we need to think about the RESTful api anyhow.
I guess that next feature will be a reason for 'wipe after stop'/any other BE that
needs reasoning.
>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gilad.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Engine-devel mailing list
>>>>> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Engine-devel mailing list
>>> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>