Il 09/01/2015 23:48, David Caro Estevez ha scritto:
I really discourage having separated repos for specs, scripts or any
'code' used for building any official packages.
That complicates (to the point of making it not feasible) a continuous build approach,
and introduces a lot of complexity and limitations to the continuous integration of the
project.
I'm not realy sure to follow. What's the difference between Juan's request and
what we have already in place for jasper-report-server or
ovirt-engine-jboss-as? We have specs and sources in different locations there too.
If we can avoid it, I really discourage it. Can we talk about it and find a more friendly
solution?
I've no strong feelings for existing or proposed solution.
I just think that from a packaging for distribution point of view, the koji way of
separating specs and sources is fine.
David Caro
On Jan 9, 2015 4:27 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Il 09/01/2015 15:13, Juan Hernández ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please create the following new git repIl 09/01/2015 15:13, Juan Hernández ha
scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Please create the following new git repositories:
>
> ovirt-engine-sdk-python-specs
> ovirt-engine-sdk-java-specs
> ovirt-engine-cli-specs
>
> They will be used to manage the RPM spec files (also scripts, patches,
> and in general anything needed for building RPMs) of the Python SDK, the
> Java SDK, and the CLI. Each repository will have branches for each pair
> of oVirt major release and supported distribution:
>
Any reason for not having something like "ovirt-specs"
with suggested branches:
> ovirt-3.5-el6
> ovirt-3.5-el7
> ovirt-3.5-fc20
> ovirt-3.5-fc21
> ovirt-3.6-el6
> ...
and having there
ovirt-engine-sdk-python/ovirt-engine-sdk-python.spec
ovirt-engine-sdk-python/0001-your-friendly-patch.patch
ovirt-engine-sdk-java/ovirt-engine-sdk-java.spec
ovirt-engine-cli/ovirt-engine-cli.spec
...
>
> Initially I will be the maintainer of these repositories.
>
> Once these repos are created the specs will be added to them and
> eventually removed completely from the main repositories of the SDKs and
> the CLI.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Juan Hernández
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com