On 09/16/2014 08:50 AM, Balamurugan Arumugam wrote:
[Adding vdsm-devel/ovirt-devel]
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kkeithle(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Balamurugan Arumugam" <barumuga(a)redhat.com>, "Dan
Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Lalatendu Mohanty" <lmohanty(a)redhat.com>,
buildsys(a)fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to
> Fedora" <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>,
glusterfs-owner(a)fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 9:27:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Broken dependencies: vdsm
>
> Posting to -devel because I can't post to vdsm-owner or virt-maintenance.
>
> On 09/15/2014 10:09 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> gluster server. AFAIK it's a mistake for vdsm to have these as
>> dependencies.
> Correcting myself. glusterfs-cli is okay, and should, AFAIK, be in
> RHEL6, although I'm not seeing that it is.
AFAIK, glusterfs-cli is present in RHEL6 but in optional channel i.e.
RHEL6(Client/Server/Workstation/ComputeNode)-optional
> glusterfs-server is not in RHEL6, and won't ever be in RHEL6,
and AFAIK
> it's a mistake for vdsm to have it as a dependency.
>
Looks like to me too. Lets check with vdsm-devel/ovirt-devel?
Regards,
Bala