Well Related-To means exactly what you are proposing where I came from (the platform
group, distgit, errata..) :)
But whatever suits you.
Martin
--
Martin Sivák
msivak(a)redhat.com
Red Hat Czech
RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Sivak" <msivak(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>, devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:53:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug
>
> > What if gerrit used the dependency info and would not -1 patches
> > that are dependency of a patch with a bug url?
>
> That is not a bad idea, but there is one use case you do not consider.. it
> would mean that feature cannot be merged before it is completed.
>
> I like my patches to be merged as soon as possible. Of course if the
> patches
> leave the tree in working state.
Right
>
> The patchset that started this thread already depends on about 15 patches
> that were merged to master two moths ago.
So how about:
Required-For:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1096197
You must merge this to get the bug fixed, but the bug status is not
changed when merged.
The hook can add the patch to the bug as a tracker.
David, can we easily add such tag?
NIr